↑ Science, Green

Green walls and living facades

5 studies on plants built into the fabric of a building, four of which measure the building rather than the person.

The architecture researcher Yiming Shao had 43 people do desk work in three rooms in 2024, one with a living wall, one with a fake living wall and one with a bare white wall, recording EEG and heart rate variability throughout. Negative psychological states built up about three times more slowly with the real wall than in the plain office. After resting in the living-wall room people came back less alert and less focused, and Shao’s recommendation follows from it: put the wall in the rest area, not beside the desks.

The rest of this literature mostly measures the building. The building researcher Ibtihaj Alsadun ran two identical office rooms in Dhahran for twelve months in 2025, one of them retrofitted with a modular hydroponic green wall, with sensors on carbon dioxide, volatile organic compounds and PM2.5 and a sub-meter on the cooling. The green wall room used 13.5% less cooling energy across the year, 574.5 kilowatt hours, rising to 17.1% at the summer peak. Carbon dioxide fell 14.1% during occupied hours, volatile organic compounds 28.1% and PM2.5 20.9%. The economic case in that paper is modelled from published relationships rather than measured, which belongs in a different column from the sensor readings.

The architecture researcher Luciana Kristanto shaded a test office in a tropical climate with Vernonia elliptica at two foliage densities in 2026. At a leaf area index of 1.5 the glass luminance dropped by up to 56.1% while the daylight factor held at 6.2%, and glare was a Daylight Glare Index of 21.67, which rates as perceptible rather than disturbing.

The architecture researcher Fatemeh Delkhosh replaced the leaves with algae. Panels of spirulina at one part algae to 60 parts water left 85% of the office space glare-free across the year, and holding the density reached after a single day of growth raised that to 95.5%.

The process engineer Victor Pozzobon modelled the same idea across four American climate zones using five years of weather data. In hot dry conditions a microalgae biofacade raised the share of time with comfortable indoor humidity from 19.7 to 62.5%. In cold humid and hot humid zones it made no difference worth having, and the thermal gain over ordinary double glazing was 0.42 gigajoules per module per year.

4 of these 5 measure light, air, energy or humidity. Only Shao measured a person, and there were 43 of them.

Adjacent Solitude · André Clemetsen

The sources

  • 1/3the speed at which negative psychological states built up during desk work with a living wall in the room, against a plain office; after resting in the same room people were less alert and less focused.Yiming Shao et al., Buildings, 2024 · 10.3390/buildings14071981
  • 13.5%less cooling energy across a year in the office room with a hydroponic green wall, 574.5 kWh, rising to 17.1% at the summer peak; CO₂ fell 14.1%, volatile organic compounds 28.1 and PM2.5 20.9.Ibtihaj Saad Rashed Alsadun et al., Buildings, 2025 · 10.3390/buildings15203656
  • 56.1%lower glass luminance behind a biotic facade at a leaf area index of 1.5, with the daylight factor holding at 6.2% and glare rated perceptible at a Daylight Glare Index of 21.67.Luciana Kristanto et al., Journal of Daylighting, 2026 · 10.15627/jd.2026.12
  • 95.5%of the office space stayed glare-free across the year behind spirulina panels held at the density reached after one day of growth, against 85% at the starting ratio of one part algae to 60 parts water.Fatemeh Delkhosh et al., Solar Compass, 2025 · 10.1016/j.solcom.2025.100116
  • 19.7 → 62.5%of the time with comfortable indoor humidity in a hot dry climate zone once a microalgae biofacade was modelled onto the building; in cold humid and hot humid zones it changed nothing worth having.Victor Pozzobon et al., Building and Environment, 2026 · 10.1016/j.buildenv.2026.114554

Findings compiled by The Built Review